Joined
·
735 Posts
I was thinking that 166, although it had great engines, didnt make a step up compared to 164. It had almost the same range, when talking about power. I just feel that being a brilliant upmarket saloon, 166 should have been offered with a V8 engine, just to cope with 540i or A6 4.2 of the time, as it was good on everything else. Or forget the Germans, just imagine how good would it be to be able to buy a 166 V8 as a second hand in these days.
There was a nice engine back there to put it in 166 - 3.2 V8 biturbo from Maserati 3200 GT or later the 4.2 V8 unit from Maserati Coupe. No need for all the way to 370-395 bhp, I think 300-320 would be quite enough.
Compared to a 6 speed manual or Sporttronic, I think Q4 would have managed to deal with the power without problems.
I guess this would compromise the position of Quattroporte inside FIAT Group, but still, no need for 400 bhp, I think 166 could have been squized one step bellow the QPorte.
There was a nice engine back there to put it in 166 - 3.2 V8 biturbo from Maserati 3200 GT or later the 4.2 V8 unit from Maserati Coupe. No need for all the way to 370-395 bhp, I think 300-320 would be quite enough.
Compared to a 6 speed manual or Sporttronic, I think Q4 would have managed to deal with the power without problems.
I guess this would compromise the position of Quattroporte inside FIAT Group, but still, no need for 400 bhp, I think 166 could have been squized one step bellow the QPorte.