Alfa Romeo Forum banner

1 - 20 of 46 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
786 Posts
Discussion Starter #1
Now I am owner of one Alfa GT 1.9 JTDm 16v (from 11/2007, 149600km, EDC16C39, see picture bellow)... My "good old" 147 1.9 JTD 8v (maybe you remember tuning activities about it) went to my sons :).
Our friend TribesMan gave me some information about tuning potentials of mentioned JTDm and EDC16C39. My additional questions are:
a) Which are issues about mechanical blocking of EGR? Is a necessary (or only suitable) to software disconnect of EGR?
b) Is it possible to mount simple freeflow intake pipe on the manifold (instead of original with butterfly) after the mechanical blocking and software disconnect of EGR?
c) What is better solution for low/mid/high range revs: BMC-CDA or original air filter?
d) Which are issues about replacement of first catalyst with downpipe for this euro4 engine?
e) Does replacement of second catalyst (with freeflow box) make some problem?
f) Does original exhaust endbox is appropriate solution for activation of tuning potential of JTDm?
g) which is limit boost for GT's GT1749v turbo?
h) is there enough space behind front bumper for FMIC?
 

Attachments

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,293 Posts
a) no issues if you do proper software mod
b) yes
c) IMO original... but some people have different opinion :)
d) none just keep the lambda probe if you have model without DPF
e) no
f) depends
g) I wouldn't go over 2.6 bar for reliable everyday car, but you can try and push it a but more... :D
h) yes
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
786 Posts
Discussion Starter #3
TribesMan - you bring a good news!
a) By blocking of EGR without proper software mod: I have a MCSF and limp mode or only light on the screen of boardcomp?
b) you remember I have opinion about BMC-CDA as slightly better solution in comparison with original air box :)
c) 2.6bar of boost (with "little" boost peaks) is enough for 24/7 car...
d) about FMIC - what is your opinion about a probably greater turbo lag as a consequence of the more complex pipe system?
e) you mean on enough space for FMIC without any modifications?
f) what is usual time for reading of EDC16c39 by use of Galletto 1260?
g) Is a Galletto 1260 proper interface for programming of EDC16c39?
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,293 Posts
a) MCSF for sure, limp mode not
d) not noticeable
e) you need custom made pipes and brackets for FMIC, but not much more
f) 45 minutes
g) depends who you ask :D
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
786 Posts
Discussion Starter #5
d) Maybe original SMIC instead of FMIC is enough good solution for everyday street driving...
g) one friend told that has checksum errors without serious consequences in use of Galletto 1260 clone in programming of EDC16c39... :confused:
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,293 Posts
Original SMIC is good for stock map... for serious tuning FMIC upgrade is first step. Without it there is no reason to go above 2.5 bar pressure. You will not be able to keep the charge temperatures down.

Dont know about Galletto checksum problems.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
786 Posts
Discussion Starter #7
What is your experience with Galletto clone in programming of EDC16c39?
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
1,730 Posts
Very nice choice!
Looks like you have the same engine as mine, only difference could be the presence of a DPF.
That dpf takes away some power potential.
Check if you have the oxygen sensor in the precat, if so, you don't have a DPF.

With mine I blocked EGR completely and placed a downpipe without any issues.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
30,126 Posts
I'd PM KendalBeefcake before you do any of the above as he spent loads making his GT faster only to have the engine go pop:(

There's a thread in the GT lounge somewhere.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,951 Posts
Nice one Dusan :thumbs: Seems I have left alone in 8V line ... :sad:
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
786 Posts
Discussion Starter #11
Very nice choice!
Check if you have the oxygen sensor in the precat, if so, you don't have a DPF.
With mine I blocked EGR completely and placed a downpipe without any issues.
I wait my GT which is on the customs inspection and after that I will check existence of lambda in the precat... Btw, I sent to you one message by email service of js-tuning...

Nice one Dusan :thumbs: Seems I have left alone in 8V line ... :sad:
Your success in tuning activities will be continued in the 16v world, for sure...
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
2,036 Posts
Myself and 'Kendalbeefcake' fitted a FMIC (from JS), removed the cats from the exhaust and removed the EGR via mapping. Power output was around the 225bhp mark.

Unfortunately Kendal's went pop, mine is still fine although the clutch can't cope with the power, an uprated clutch is a must IMHO.

I haven't had any error messages with mine and it has no cats and no egr, the car has just past the MOT test with no problems too. I had the exhaust custom made with the sensor in the precat fitted.

I assume you'll be fitting the Q2?

b)this could be a problem. You'll see from the pic that the battery could be a problem when removing the butterfly valve. I assume you'd want to shorten the piping slightly and go straight out of the block to the intercooler removing two bends in the piping? With the battery in place this makes it impossible.

To fit the FMIC you'll have to modify the airbox (remove the resonator). I had no noticeable difference in turbo lag.
 

Attachments

·
Registered
Joined
·
786 Posts
Discussion Starter #13 (Edited)
Which year and ECU was yours former GT?
On my older 1.8 JTD 8v I replaced obstacle box (see picture) from top of battery to side.
 

Attachments

·
Registered
Joined
·
53 Posts
To fit the FMIC you'll have to modify the airbox (remove the resonator). I had no noticeable difference in turbo lag.
To fit an FMIC you dont have to cut anything in the airbox. I've installed one myself at home and didn't cut.

By the way there are better options then a FMIC of that type. I've intalled one with 460x160x90 and the results are far away from what i expect and desire. Mainly because of the GT's front bumper shape.

I will install soon an FMIC with 580x365 frontal area in my GT without any significant mods (will not cut anything).

By the way 225hp on OEM turbo, or your car is running extremely high boost pressure (+1.7bar) or your rolling roads is mesuring bad. I know a guy with a Fiat Bravo 1.9 JTDm witch had done an very agressive remap (1.75bar boost) and broke his turbo in one week :eek: Now has 206hp with 1.65bar and lots of smoke.

My car has 194hp and 406Nm with 1.55bar without any smoke. Mods (very ineficient) FMIC, reinforced clutch, EGR off and remap. Soon new FMIC, downpipe, Ducati Corse injectors and remap adjustment. Expected power: 205/210hp and some torque. Smoke free of course.
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
770 Posts
you can bolt on a straigt inlet wich would replace the butterflyvalve , but then you would still have the narrow egr channel beyond it.
Only sullution is to weld a bigger pipe to the inlet like I did with my 20v.




You wil lose the egr mounting , so that went aswell
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
786 Posts
Discussion Starter #16
I will install soon an FMIC with 580x365 frontal area in my GT without any significant mods (will not cut anything).
460x160x90 FMIC was symmetrically or asymmetrically regards to the middle of front bumper?
Symmetrically positioned 580mmx365mm FMIC can be installed without cutting of anything?

By the way 225hp on OEM turbo, or your car is running extremely high boost pressure (+1.7bar) or your rolling roads is mesuring bad. I know a guy with a Fiat Bravo 1.9 JTDm witch had done an very agressive remap (1.75bar boost) and broke his turbo in one week :eek: Now has 206hp with 1.65bar and lots of smoke.
My car has 194hp and 406Nm with 1.55bar without any smoke. Mods (very ineficient) FMIC, reinforced clutch, EGR off and remap. Soon new FMIC, downpipe, Ducati Corse injectors and remap adjustment. Expected power: 205/210hp and some torque. Smoke free of course.
I had 147 1.9 JTD 8v with 1.68bar of boost (even with 1.9bar peaks) in a period of one year without turbo issues or problems...

@Allerd - I have picture for this mod in my version...
 

Attachments

·
Registered
Joined
·
1,951 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
786 Posts
Discussion Starter #19
@yan.ko - Yes I know about this - very similar disposition and FMIC dimension as my FMIC for "good old" 147 1.9 JTD 8v...
@Allerd - maybe we have very different inlet chambers (2.4 20v and 1.9 8v), but I simple removed EGR completely and put simple pipe fixed by three screws...
 
1 - 20 of 46 Posts
Top