Joined
·
2,241 Posts
Surely if it's flood damage can claim on insurance? What would happen if, for instance, your car was parked near a beach and the sea smashed into??
All I am saying is this.
All I am saying is this.
Haha, I think you are spot on there! It's either that or a stick which sits in the car which is marked at intake height which I can deploy before entering puddles! Or the pop the hose off the top of the airbox trick I've subsequently learned...Taranty......this is what you need....
http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/HOVERCRAF...248933?hash=item3d0de704e5:g:buEAAOSw3ydVix5H
:vs_lol:
It may not be covered if you voluntarily drive into the water having misjudged the depth. It's significantly different to parked car being inundated by rising water. In any event, it's kind of academic because by the time you account for excess (£250 I think, possible £350) the value I'd get back even if it was covered would be immediately wiped out in lost no claims, so nothing to be gained from a claim.Surely if it's flood damage can claim on insurance? What would happen if, for instance, your car was parked near a beach and the sea smashed into??
All I am saying is this.
It is usually covered if you drive into flood water, its not much different to driving into a wall or another car from the insurance's perspective. But your 156 can't be worth more than £700-800 book value, they'd just write it off. If it was a ten grand car needing 3 or 4 grand's worth of engine work it'd be worth claiming but in your case, you'd not get much after they take off the excess and then they'd recoup it in higher premiums for the next few years.It may not be covered if you voluntarily drive into the water having misjudged the depth. It's significantly different to parked car being inundated by rising water. In any event, it's kind of academic because by the time you account for excess (£250 I think, possible £350) the value I'd get back even if it was covered would be immediately wiped out in lost no claims, so nothing to be gained from a claim.
That guy does not slow down for speed bumps, does he.You're right, no mention in the policy docs of an exclusion for damage caused by flood foolishness. It was recovery insurance I was thinking of which does exclude for self-inflicted flood trouble, or at least some do. Excess is £350 though, so would definitely have lost any pay out very quickly in lost no claims.
As for the ebay car, a mate from (original) home down there went to have a look tonight and I'm glad he did. As the pics below show the front end is a bit of a mess, something which was strangely not mentioned in the listing. The state of it is pretty much enough to put me off on its own, not to mention the general lack of confidence I now have in the accuracy of the description!
Crap, really could do with not having to spend that much, I'm not planning on keeping the car too long. Will try and have a proper look underneath at some point today to see how bad it is, but to be honest given the drip rate I think pretty bad is the answer.Yeah thats the oil cooler, they tend to go where the pipe meets the rad.
Not a bad job to change, apart from the obvious corroded bolts etc, probably doable without removing the bumper tbh, but they are not cheap, about £180 for the rad and probably same again for the pipes, but Autolusso do a kit for about £220 to replace the lot.
Autolusso - Oil Coolers
I think I've got a good used pair of pipes & cooler, will check tomorrow when I'm back in.Crap, really could do with not having to spend that much, I'm not planning on keeping the car too long. Will try and have a proper look underneath at some point today to see how bad it is, but to be honest given the drip rate I think pretty bad is the answer.
Cheers Dan, that would be really good. I'll give you a bell tomorrow to check and get a price for them plus fitting, I can't see myself having any time to do it myself given that work is flowing over into the weekend at the moment - makes me very popular with the Mrs on mothers' day!I think I've got a good used pair of pipes & cooler, will check tomorrow when I'm back in.
Yep, rear 3/4 view is definitely the best angle for the wagon!Nice work!
Liking the shot from behind. :thumbup:
Its low on the GT JTS, same as a 156 Twinspark just about. I'd take the long way around.Reading this thread , i just want to ask , how low would the air intake be on a GT ?
There is a wonderful old country pub a few miles from me, but to reach it you have to go through a ford possibly up to about a foot deep. I suspect it would be wiser to take the slightly longer way to reach the pub which is only an extra mile.
Been through this ford many times in different cars with no problems but unwilling to in the GT for fear of the expensive consequences