Alfa Romeo Forum banner
21 - 40 of 50 Posts
There was a thread in the GT lounge with a guy who ran a 3.2 and was having similar problems. Eventual fix for that seems to have been to replace pre-cat lambda sensors and give the TB a good clean.
 
There was a thread in the GT lounge with a guy who ran a 3.2 and was having similar problems. Eventual fix for that seems to have been to replace pre-cat lambda sensors and give the TB a good clean.
CF3 v6's i.e. all GTA's should have 4 cats. 2 in the exhaust manifolds and 2 in the mid section under the car.

They also have 4 sensors. 2 in the manifolds that read the gasses before they go through the manifold (pre) cats and two under the car by the main cats.

The ones under the car are easy to swap. The pre cat lambdas in the manifolds, not so much. The front bank is doable. I looked at replacing the rear one and decided to leave it till I took the engine out to change the cam belt and clutch.
 
CF3 v6's i.e. all GTA's should have 4 cats. 2 in the exhaust manifolds and 2 in the mid section under the car.

They also have 4 sensors. 2 in the manifolds that read the gasses before they go through the manifold (pre) cats and two under the car by the main cats.

The ones under the car are easy to swap. The pre cat lambdas in the manifolds, not so much. The front bank is doable. I looked at replacing the rear one and decided to leave it till I took the engine out to change the cam belt and clutch.
Anyway to tell how they are working? As far as i can tell mine are the ones that came with car, so are getting on for 13 years old. MES will show me a voltage reading for them but I have no idea what that data is telling me.
 
(To Ruskins).....this may help.
My precat lambdas were switching from around 0.045-0.8 volts each second which I believe to be within working limits.
The postcat lambdas were steady in their reading, front bank was 0.7 and rear 0.8 volts.
The precats were running closed loop and the postcats open loop.
 
Mine read quite changable readings between 0.2 & 0.9v
Were the precat lambdas reading 0.2 as you state or 0.02? It's my understanding that they are effectively switching on and off every second or so. If they are switching between 0.2 and 0.9v 'maybe' they aren't operating correctly. I say 'maybe' as I'm not 100% sure but my readings are very similar to the readings posted by others here who believe their lambdas to be operating within limits.
 
at idle:

Time. Air quantity. Lambda 1 signal (Pre-Cat.) Lambda 2 signal (Pre-Cat.)

sec Kg/h V V
0 49.5 0.445 0.152
0.69 46.6 0.812 0.65
1.39 45.1 0.011 0.011
2.08 45.9 0.001 0.006
2.77 47.3 0.006 0.03
3.44 45.6 0.792 0.846
4.13 39.1 0.816 0.846
4.83 39.6 0.841 0.855
5.53 39.4 0.846 0.079
6.22 36.5 0.094 0.128
6.91 32.1 0.743 0.089
7.6 24.5 0.772 0.826
8.28 20.4 0.499 0.821
8.97 20.3 0.064 0.753
9.66 19.3 0.167 0.523
10.35 19.5 0.719 0.104
11.03 35.5 0.128 0.733
11.72 25.4 0.646 0.689
12.39 24.5 0.66 0.108
13.08 24.8 0.094 0.714
13.77 25.3 0.099 0.172
14.47 26.1 0.699 0.108
15.18 25.8 0.133 0.768
15.86 25.6 0.104 0.108
16.55 25.6 0.729 0.172
17.24 26.4 0.104 0.665
17.93 26.2 0.729 0.138
18.61 24.8 0.792 0.099
19.3 26.1 0.235 0.299

under acceleration

286.28 25.1 0.104 0.831
286.97 88.7 0.235 0.089
287.66 112.5 0.66 0.787
288.35 172.7 0.099 0.753
289.03 234.7 0.089 0.787
289.71 341 0.118 0.855
290.38 379.5 0.875 0.885
291.07 240 0.904 0.86
291.75 362.6 0.895 0.885
292.44 451.7 0.875 0.88
293.13 496.4 0.885 0.899
293.81 111 0.87 0.792
294.5 330.1 0.855 0.86
295.19 364.1 0.851 0.851
295.88 359.1 0.86 0.846
296.57 390.8 0.855 0.865
297.25 398.3 0.87 0.87
297.94 415.1 0.89 0.89
298.63 103.4 0.855 0.855
299.32 272.3 0.797 0.724
300.02 76.1 0.748 0.782
300.69 79.4 0.709 0.748
301.38 82.5 0.724 0.777
302.07 83.3 0.099 0.582
302.75 79 0.699 0.099
303.44 81.9 0.099 0.763
304.13 80.4 0.694 0.094
304.82 77.2 0.108 0.729
305.5 75 0.123 0.787
306.19 74.4 0.006 0.016
306.88 80.9 0.001 0.006
 
Air mass values look all over the place, especially at idle where they should be almost rock steady.

Graph format would be easier to decipher though, can you do that from MES?

The "under acceleration", test, is this a run in a single gear for example 4th gear 30-90mph at full throttle?
 
Air mass values look all over the place, especially at idle where they should be almost rock steady.

Graph format would be easier to decipher though, can you do that from MES?
your wish is my command - idle air flow on a chart!

Is 0 seconds the startup time? Maybe the high reading is due to rich mixture..seems to flatten out after that.
 

Attachments

Ruskins you can read the lambda signals through a graph on the free version of MES. There is a way to then download the whole timeline to your laptop. I've not done that myself but you could just take a screen grab which should give enough of a sample of the readings for a clearer picture.
 
21 - 40 of 50 Posts