Alfa Romeo Forum banner

3681 - 3700 of 3721 Posts

·
Registered
Joined
·
16,034 Posts
@vitorio, definitely the GTC4 over that Aston abomination for me.

On a completely different level, and I might well be on my own with this one, but always thought the Jag (Mondeo) X-Type estate looked good:
View attachment 949001
Hardly car porn admittedly, but neither is much of the stuff posted on here IMHO!
I don't disagree. It looks much better than the saloon which is very peculiar from the back. I might even have bought one if I could have found one in a nice dark colour without the chrome. Sadly most of those on the market had were pensioner spec with the full shiny tat package and an added cat/bottle opener thing on the bonnet.
 
  • Like
Reactions: lussoman

·
Administrator
Joined
·
46,877 Posts


It’s this one for me.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I saw one of them driving around the Amsterdam ring road a couple of years ago. It sounded rather fruity too.

The boot is rather weird - the floor of it is a lot higher than you'd expect - whether it has storage space beneath it I'm not sure.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
16,034 Posts
I want another estate car now.
 

Attachments

·
Registered
Joined
·
821 Posts
I saw one of them driving around the Amsterdam ring road a couple of years ago. It sounded rather fruity too.

The boot is rather weird - the floor of it is a lot higher than you'd expect - whether it has storage space beneath it I'm not sure.
The opening is so narrow too, I doubt it really offers much practicality over the coupe version but it just looks so much cooler! I’d love to have seen one, I imagine they look truly special on the roads. And it’s always a treat to hear one of those Aston V12s!



It’s all a bit speed boaty back there. Oh I need one!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

·
Registered
Alfa 159 2.0 JTDm Lusso 6sp.
Joined
·
5,401 Posts
Like there is really a choice??? The F40 of course....a true classic and a proper drives car too, not hobbled by electronics or unnecessary weight and gizmos .....although its often said about other cars, the F40 really is a "race car for the road".
Obviously the fact that its the only one I've ever driven or likely to drive (a wealthy friend of my dad had one for about a year back in the day....even he struggled to afford to run it even though he now has three Lambos!).....has no bearing on my decision!!!
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
7,624 Posts
Hmmm.
Probably the F40, because it looks like a Ferrari. The F50 is ugly, the Enzo looks like a kit car.
 
  • Like
Reactions: vitorio

·
Registered
Joined
·
618 Posts
@alfaitalia I wholeheartedly agree, i was originally going to post just the F40, but felt like doen a keithy style trio

Mind you, i wouldnt mind having a drive in an F50, it might be ugly looking, but that F1 derived V12 just behind your spine must be quite the sensation.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
821 Posts
I’m going to upset the balance and go F50. It’s perhaps even more of a racer for the road than the F40 was, since it came with an actual F1 engine. And I know most people prefer the clean looks of the F40, but it’s the F50 all day for me there too.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

·
Administrator
Joined
·
46,877 Posts
Am I allowed to be ornery and say none of them really do much for me?

I would pick the F40 though, because it is unarguably legendary in a way which I think neither of the others can match.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
618 Posts
Am I allowed to be ornery and say none of them really do much for me?

I would pick the F40 though, because it is unarguably legendary in a way which I think neither of the others can match.
Is that a "im not a ferrari guy" thing, or are these just the wrong ones?

If we want to make the choice a bit more challenging, at least for me, how about this one?
 

·
Registered
Alfa 159 2.0 JTDm Lusso 6sp.
Joined
·
5,401 Posts
288 GT0....nice, rare over 400 horses and very expensive....especially as it looks so much like a cooking 328 GTB!
 

·
Administrator
Joined
·
46,877 Posts
Is that a "im not a ferrari guy" thing, or are these just the wrong ones?
I guess probably the former, although there are some I like. Daytona, Dino. The one you picture I could bring myself to like. :D

Actually, I suppose it might be more that hypercars don't do it for me. I'm much more of a GT guy. I feel like, in their quest for performance above everything, they lose something of the aesthetic of 'car'.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
7,624 Posts
The one in the last pic looks like the type of Ferrari where you'd need the gold medallion and unbuttoned shirt to complete the look. And possibly facial hair a la Magnum.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
16,034 Posts
I'm more of a GT car man too but the 288GTO and F40 are the only cars of this type that genuinely float my boat. They are both purposeful in a way others aren't.

The F50 looks like they were told to remove the F40's sharp edges to make it safe for children. The Enzo just doesn't do it for me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: alfaitalia

·
Registered
Joined
·
16,034 Posts
When I said 288GTO and F40, I really meant the F1 too. Again it has purpose but the packaging is incredible. On the rare occasions I've seen one I'm always struck by how tiny the seem.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
821 Posts
The F1 will forever be the greatest for me. As a 90s boy I’ve got a lot of nostalgia for the cars of that period, and the F1 was top dog.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
3681 - 3700 of 3721 Posts
Top