Report here from the BBC. I dont know these areas, but something tells me they suffer quite bad congestion. So, many drivers at some times of the day would love to be travelling at 60MPH. But the article refers to N0x being the problem, this is predominantly a diesel issue, isnt it? Is this a blunt instrument to fix a problem that will fail?
But the article refers to N0x being the problem, this is predominantly a diesel issue, isnt it? Is this a blunt instrument to fix a problem that will fail?
There are 4 stretches of 4.5 miles according to the news report I read. Don’t forget that direct injection petrol engines also produce NOx and under the Euro 6 limits (and there are different types), for petrol and diesel cars are similar with respect to laboratory measurement allowances and petrol limits for CO2 are higher. It’s not quite so easy as just blaming diesels especially as newer engines and pollution control as part of exhaust systems are much more effective than previous examples.
Whilst not related to road traffic on motorways and NOx, it is important to realise that modern gas central heating boilers operating at higher temperatures produce significant levels of NOx and that would have an effect in urban areas, perhaps it isn’t so simple.
It's a couple of years since I've used it, but they've already had 60 mph limits on the M1 through Sheffield & further, albeit only, from memory, between 7AM & 7PM, so I don't know why they need a new trial.
Maybe introduce lower tax rates for people who are happy to have a limiter of 60mph put on their cars? And make everyone else pay the same amount to drive up to 70mph? As cars get safer, drag coefficients lower and performance increases, we should be increasing speed limits, not reducing them.
They should get off the roads the 1000's of vehicles which are, un taxed, no insurance or mot, banned drivers, vehicles with removed or tampered emmision systems and not forgetting the ones belching out smoke because of lack of servicing or a engine warning light stuck on.
It would be more effective to bad emmisons cheating VAG cars from that particular stretch of road.
It could also be that engines run less efficiently at 60mph than at 70mph. Our Giulietta for instance isn't really happy in 6th gear at 60mph, where as at 70 it is fine. I am sure that the emmisions are higher at 60mph in 5th than at 70mph in 6th as it is running at higher RPM.
On the M602 at peak times, 60mph would be pretty good going. On the M5 I don't think I've managed much more than walking pace on most of my journeys.
I can see logic in the argument that if all the traffic is doing a similar speed it flows better though. If you increase the limit you will still have people doing 55-60 but the ones who currently drive at 90ish will start doing 100ish. That's a big speed difference to deal with when you're hacking across three lanes at the last second to get to your junction in your S3.
I noticed while driving on French Autoroutes this summer that there were a number of sections where temporary low speed limits were in effect to reduce "le pollution". Around Lyons there were several stretches of 130/110 that were limited to 90 for emissions. People were taking them seriously too.
There’s been a 30mph limit on junctions 1 and 2 on the M5 for the last year or two so 60 is a dream by comparison!
I’m not wholly convinced by the plans, I thought similar when I saw gantry signs a little while ago telling you to slow down to produce less pollutants. Surely crawling along is causing more problems?
Why don't the governement put a bit more effort into preventing stop start traffic due to congestion on our motorways? Stopping and starting would create much more pollution than sitting at 2,500 rpm at 70mph surely? Not to mention brake particulates.
Our fun will be taken away long before we are all in EVs or having to drive at 60 on motorways....have you seen this?....potentially no more speeding...boo!
Our fun will be taken away long before we are all in EVs or having to drive at 60 on motorways....have you seen this?....potentially no more speeding...boo!
Ah brilliant, yet another excuse for motorists to not be paying attention. Driving foot flat to the floor, wondering what they will have for dinner rather than remaining alert and attentive
The mandatory speed limiters can be disabled but you'd have to do it each time you get in the car. There might be a wide open throttle override too for 'emergencies'. I think you can be sure the ECU will record any overrides which could be interesting in the case of an insurance claim.
On the Nox issues I'd be interested to see the split of emissions between cars and lorries, a 60 limit will have zero effect on the commercial vehicles that already travel at that speed or slower.
Speed limits are frustrating but I see their need as a good chunk of people are not responsible.
I live near the A13 near London and it utterly winds me up there is a 50 mph speed limit enforced with average cameras THAT ARE ACTIVE IN THE MIDDLE OF THE NIGHT WHEN YOU ARE THE ONLY CAR ON 3 LANES Plus when it's busy you haven't got a hope in hell of doing 50 mph anyway!!!
The mandatory speed limiters can be disabled but you'd have to do it each time you get in the car. There might be a wide open throttle override too for 'emergencies'. I think you can be sure the ECU will record any overrides which could be interesting in the case of an insurance claim.
Spare a thought for the kids today, some girl at work is 18 and she has a black box on her car. The instant she goes over the speed limit, even by a fraction she gets an email from the insurer. Do it 3 times and her policy gets cancelled apparently
I messed around with loads of two stroke bikes in my younger years and i have lived to tell the tale. But if i start up the (diesel) Alfa and allow it to run whilst de-icing the windows it makes me choke like hell.
That’s interesting. Although worth noting that they note there are differences between exhaust and non exhaust particulates chemically with different toxicity.
Luckily there are a range of other benefits of EVs and a small improvement in PM emissions is not the driving factor for their uptake.
Has there ever been a study which shows that the lifetime environmental impact of:
(a) Electric vehicles or
(b) Hybrids
is greater than that of internal combustion petrol or diesel vehicles? I haven't found one.
Is there an expectation that:
(a) the costs and
(b) the environmental impact
of the young electric vehicle industry will fail to improve with development, in the way it has in the 130 year-old motor industry?
Where now are the people who used to tell us that wind and solar energy would be:
(a) more expensive than other sources and
(b) only ever make a small contribution to meeting demand
We don't seem to hear from them.
First question.....On Evs No....none that ive seen.....but their whole life emissions (production, use, disposal) are not the night and day improvement over ICEs that lots expect and many believe! Hydrids...several I believe ....I will try to hunt one down when I finish this.
EDIT....two minute google found this....amongst many others.
The hybrid car may be the savior of the automobile industry, but its production processes have come under fire of late. The car may be green, but what about the way the car actually gets made?
science.howstuffworks.com
Second question....No!...of course they will get better in all those respects….especially when Tesla stop making cars to concentrate on battery production and the big boys like VW, Merc and BMW get properly into EVs and produce cars that are superior to the Tesla offerings in every way ( to be honest Dacia use better quality materials for the interior....horrible!!...so it wont be difficult!)
Third Question....they were largely wrong. Although there is already a question over the lifespan of wind turbines not being anything like what was expected.....and like to increase expected generation cost as they need to be replaced with superior ones....especially the off shore ones!! Surely that should not of come as a surprise to many!! LOL. I would not be surprised to see the next generation of nuclear power stations killing the renewable sector stone dead though....the next gen technology is a massive step forward in safety, efficiency and waste production over the old ones we had.. Much more power all from a just a few places to (rather than the blots all over the landscape that are wind turbines and solar farms.)
The mining of the raw materials must produce a fairly large environmental impact, and as a lot of it comes from poorer countries you can bet that there's a fair bit of exploitation involved as well.
For the first 40/50 years of the motor industry the car was considered to be a luxury that only the relatively rich could afford despite Henry Ford's production line techniques. Even as late as the 1950s the traffic exiting factory gates at closing time was predominately bicycles. I hope that the same will not be true of the young electric vehicle industry but unless the price drops significantly they will remain something for only the relatively well off who can afford to indulge in eco politics. Most people will look at the bottom line cost and continue to buy what is the most economic solution for them.
Plug-in hybrid cars emit more than 2.5 times more carbon emissions in the real world than in lab tests, analysis suggests
www.telegraph.co.uk
Apparently owners don't bother recharging them via the plug-in but rely on the inbuilt engine kicking in automatically.
I wonder how much of the choosing of a hybrid is drivers virtue signalling to their bosses/neighbours
My former employer had a small fleet of Hybrids and I was the one of the only ones who understood to plug them in when not in use. Everyone else just screamed around on full petrol....
I'm fairly sure production causes the most pollution for any given car but we live in a consumer society so they can't tout keeping ancient cars going despite that possibly being the real solution.
Well if the infrastructure catches up then EVs will probably be fine. Things like having charging strips on major roads would help massively and enable them to traverse motorways like any other car...
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Related Threads
?
?
?
?
?
Alfa Romeo Forum
7.1M posts
216.7K members
Since 2001
The friendly Alfa Romeo Club - If you are looking to buy or you are already an Alfa Romeo owner, join alfaowner.com today to get the most from your ownership