1.8 TS or 2.0 JTS - Alfa Romeo Forum
You are currently unregistered, register for more features.    
Thread Tools
(Post Link) post #1 of 6 Old 02-10-14 Thread Starter
Status: -
AO Member
adf83's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: United Kingdom
County: Surrey
Posts: 574
1.8 TS or 2.0 JTS

I'm considering a GT but I don't want a diesel. My question is what is better, a 1.8 TS or 2.0JTS? I remember from when I had my 147 2.0 TS remapped, there were a few JTSs there that day and they all made a lot less power than they should as standard. Also there seem to be more problems reported with the JTS. The 1.8 seems a popular engine on here even over the 2.0 TS as it doesn't have the balancer belts and it still seems to make decent power. Does anybody have experience of both engines?
adf83 is offline  
Sponsored Links
Status: -
AO Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: United Kingdom
County: Staffordshire
Posts: 760
The 1.8TS capacity is only 1747cc compared to the 2.0TS/JTS capacity of 1970cc, that is over 11% less.
The rated power of the 1.8TS engine is 144PS compared to the 2.0TS's 155PS, that is over 7% less.
The rated torque of the 1.8TS engine is 144Nm compared to the 2.0TS's 169Nm, that is nearly 15% less.
I would choose a 2.0TS any time over the 1.8TS.

Why the fuss about balancer shafts and belt I don't know; according to my old 156 handbook the 2.0TS weighs an extra 20Kg, probably that is due to the balance shafts, can't really see it could be anything else. The 156 weighs an extra 1.6% with the 2.0TS engine, insignificant when the extra power & torque is taken into account.

The JTS engine did have a lot of coking-up problems in its first incarnation but the later euro4 engine had new camshafts, piston rings, ECU, etc. and is far better (the GTV never had the euro3 engine). I should imagine the earlier GTs did have the euro3 engine, but 2004 or later cars should be OK.
There are more problems with the JTS, it is a more advanced & complicated engine than the TS having 4 instead of 2 lambda sensors, direct injection, lean-burn at low revs, higher compression ratio, etc. One of the problems is that the injectors operate in an extreme environment and so really need changing or at least cleaning after about 60,000 miles. I changed mine at 72,000 miles paying 100 each for a set + 4 hours labour to fit, but there was a very noticeable increase in overall performance.

Comparing the 2.0TS to the 2.0JTS, the most noticeable difference is at low revs, the JTS pulls like a tractor, it has massive diesel-like torque when pulling away but no diesel-like almost instantly running out of revs. At higher revs it is practically identical to the TS in performance, but you cannot feel the various stages (inlet manifold length change, valve timing change) coming into action so is less exhilarating.
sensingsys is offline  
Status: SOLD my 156!
AO Gold Member
gazza82's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: United Kingdom
County: Buckinghamshire
Posts: 9,067
Not sure the GT came with the 2.0TS engine so you can't really compare ... you need to looks at the 2.0JTS values.

Remember the GT is not a 156 underneath the skin, it's a 147 so you also have the CANbus electrics.
gazza82 is offline  
Status: -
AO Platinum Member
Ralf S.'s Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: The land that Time forgot
Posts: 13,065
1.8 T/Sparks rack up some big mileages though...

Ralf S.
Ralf S. is offline  
Status: zzzzzzzz
AO Platinum Member
symon's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: United Kingdom
County: Oxfordshire
Posts: 36,950
I would have the 1.8 TS.

Overall it isn't much slower and they are more reliable. They also seem to use less oil, and cambelt changes will be cheaper.
symon is offline  
Status: -
AO Gold Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: United Kingdom
County: Derbyshire
Posts: 6,506
I have no experience of the JTS, but I've had 1.8 & 2.0 TS's. The power characteristics are quite different, with the 1.8 being much more "peaky".

The 1.8 is rather flat below about 3,500 rev/min, while the 2.0 pulls strongly from 2,000-ish. What this means in real life is that driving briskly the 1.8 requires more use of the gearbox than the 2.0.
Dave Brand is offline  

Go Back   Alfa Romeo Forum > Supported Alfa Romeo Models > Technical & Vehicle Assistance > Engines (TS, JTS, JTD & V6)


Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Show Printable Version
Email this Page Email this Page

Posting Rules  
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome