The points raised here are barely scratching the surface.
How about UK press not comparing with a UK designed, developed and built Elise SC which is nearly identical to it, but constantly comparing and putting in the spotlight a Porsche Cayman?
How about the tricked lap where that rag said a 4C could not take a standard Cayman, when there are at least three other laptimes where it leaves even a Cayman S behind?
How about EVO first cheering it up to high heaven, giving it four out of five stars and then saying it is "unfit for purpose" on the road when compared to other supercars (not on UK but on FRENCH roads, mind) while Anthony read takes it up Goodwood Hill (remind me, what country is Goodwood at?) and does so faster than a Vantage V12 while applauding steering confidence and roadholding?
How about Chris "balanced" Harris going on about how it is "utter madness" for the 4C "only" having a sophisticated suspension on the front and not the back, and that this is the "problem" it has with the steering, while the more expensive Cayman S which is "the best" has such suspension NEITHER front NOR back - AND the -until now oh so hated but suddenly much better- electrically powered steering?
Before you start typing "tin foil hat" : Porsche is owned by Volkswagen : if I were to tell you they rigged an award in favor of the Golf, would you say they do not need to do so and I am loose in the head? Read on and perhaps reconsider: Yahoo!