 |
|
 |
15-12-2003
|
#1 (Post Link)
|
|
AO Silver Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Dublin, Ireland.
Posts: 3,071
|
Good question... A Head Gasket problem does not explain the oil in the exhaust fumes on gear-change, but then how else is it getting there...
http://www.quickclickcarfix.com/quick23.html
Maybe you have more than one problem...
|
|
|
15-12-2003
|
#2 (Post Link)
|
|
AO Silver Member
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Dublin, Ireland.
Posts: 3,071
|
Yeah, it's a bit basic.
Is there a test you can do with an air compressor where you fill the cylinder under test through the spark plug hole, then move the cylinder so it's at the bottom of it's compression stroke, and look for air leaks around the valve guides, while pouring fresh oil on them?
Not knowing that engine at all, how possible would that be?
|
|
|
15-12-2003
|
#3 (Post Link)
|
|
AO Silver Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Bristol
Posts: 2,605
|
Put a bit of oil in through the spark plug hole, then do the compression test straight away. If you get high compression which gradually drops, then it's your bores / piston rings. Also, try running the engine with the oil cap off; if you get lots of chuffing, then it's either piston rings / bores or the breather system is blocked. PS, to get 175psi you need to run a compression ratio of 12:1; does that sound right for an S4 engine? 120psi sounds pretty low though.
Good luck!
|
|
|
15-12-2003
|
#4 (Post Link)
|
|
AO Gold Member
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Terra Australis
Posts: 9,948
|
Smoke at gear change-most likely valve oils seals (ie oil being sucked into cylinder only on engine deacceleration and then being burnt off)
Mayonaise-most likely head gasket.
Compession OK then valve seats and rings OK
normally you would do a dry compression check then "wet" (with a squirt of oil in each cylinder to ensure ring sealing) to determine if rings OK. Should be very little difference between a dry and wet compression test.
Sounds like you need a head job
Could possible get it done here eek!  laughing http://www.news.com.au/common/story_...E13762,00.html
|
|
|
05-01-2004
|
#5 (Post Link)
|
|
AO Admin
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Paesi Bassi
Posts: 13,294
|
Good to hear you have located the problem. I hope that my Nord engine is in better shape though.
|
|
|
05-01-2004
|
#6 (Post Link)
|
|
AO Gold Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Malta
Posts: 6,682
|
why is it so hard to remove the head?
do the bolts go through the coolant and corrode?
As you can see I have nearly no experience in this.. we only dismantled an engine once (well 2 engines) but the cylinder head was not hollow where the bolts went through ... if you know what i mean  .. they went throught solid metal with only a hole for the bolt ..
|
|
|
05-01-2004
|
#7 (Post Link)
|
|
AO Silver Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 4,217
|
Jamie...
When the head is of, better have new exhaust valve guides fitted. On me old GTV I tried fitting new valvestem gaskets, worked for a fortnight. Then the blue puff at gearchanges came back with a vengeance. I could then start all over rant . Luckily I had the pleasure of fitting new headgasket 7 times within 6 months, so the head of/on jobbie only took 3 hours in the end
--Hoygs
|
|
|
26-01-2004
|
#8 (Post Link)
|
|
AO Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Côte d'Azur, France.
Posts: 442
|
Re: 105 Engine ill
Looks good Jamie!
My small piece of advice and friendly warning: it could be wise to bolt suitable pieces of metal "hose" to those cylinder head bolts so that they will keep the cylinder liners tightly down. If you are unlucky and somebody turns the engine even a bit, the liners may move upwards and you'll need some more work again...
pexi
|
|
|
26-01-2004
|
#9 (Post Link)
|
|
AO Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Côte d'Azur, France.
Posts: 442
|
Re: 105 Engine ill
Originally Posted by Jamie and the magic torch
cheers for that, Ive got the proper liner holders (little blue things on the 4th photo), I just took them off whilst I was cleaning the gasket off the block.
Right, I should have noticed them, but I was too keen on looking the 3rd photo, admiring your wisdom to fill the camshaft chain hole with rags to avoid dropping small pieces down to the sump. 
|
|
|
03-03-2004
|
#10 (Post Link)
|
|
AO Silver Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 4,217
|
Re: 105 Engine ill
First photo looks great, looks like they did a fab job.
-- Hoygs
|
|
|
03-03-2004
|
#11 (Post Link)
|
|
AO Silver Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Wetherby
Posts: 4,257
|
Re: 105 Engine ill
Looks fantastic Jamie.....aren't the Valves big!, no wonder they are torquey.. 
|
|
|
04-03-2004
|
#12 (Post Link)
|
|
AO Silver Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Dublin, Ireland
Posts: 1,968
|
Re: 105 Engine ill
|
|
|
15-03-2004
|
#13 (Post Link)
|
|
|
Re: 105 Engine ill
Plenty of good answers but nobody has said what is wrong with LRP. I can tell you folks that LRP is a slow burning fuel. Unfortunately no British Standards exist so every maker has his own formula. The fuel burns slow ad with with spark ignition engines the it is often sill buring when the inlet valve still opens, hence you often get spitting back through the inlet port, and incomplete combustion. The performance engines like yours it isn't good enough---someone described it very well!!
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|