A life is good thread would be a real breath of fresh air...
On re-reading the BBC webpage.... I looked for real substance in the 'news'
... and what was it?
Well.... a Local Government Association chairman has written a letter..
He has cautioned councils about "overzealous use of surveillance" because it is likely to "alienate the public" which, to me, seems perfectly reasonable (there are always one or two people who overstep the mark... even here on AO).
3 examples are then quoted but were clearly not in the letter. They have been inserted by the journalist to raise the profile of the story.
The letter is then possibly (but not clearly) quoted again with "dog fouling and littering" as being two areas that were not considered "necessary or proportionate".
Sir Simon is then quoted as saying
"I don't think councils are abusing their powers, but there have been one or two instances... where it could be said that perhaps some of the offences being investigated were too trivial to be using surveillance techniques."
And then the journalist really gets into his stride....
It is estimated that about 3,000 people have been targeted in the last year, for alleged offences that included dog smuggling, storing petrol without permission and keeping unburied animal carcasses.
Estimated by whom? (unburied animal carcasses?.... is this the rural news or the town news?)
"A survey of fewer than 10% of councils, carried out by the Press Association, showed that spying techniques were used 1,343 times"
A survey carried out by the Press... well that will be reliable won't it?
....and the whole thing ends very lamely with a Civil Rights Activist jumping on the bandwagon...
Not exactly earth shattering in my opinion.