 |
|
View Poll Results: Do you find tatoos on women attractive?
|
|
Yes...
|
  
|
18 |
27.69% |
|
No
|
  
|
33 |
50.77% |
|
Other
|
  
|
14 |
21.54% |
 |
|
27-02-2008
|
#26 (Post Link)
|
|
AO Platinum Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bristol, England
Posts: 25,305
|
Re: Tatoos on women. Is it a turn off?
Horrible  |
|
|
|
27-02-2008
|
#27 (Post Link)
|
|
Club Member
Club Member Number: 613
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: HELL!!....or thereabouts
Posts: 9,563
|
Re: Tatoos on women. Is it a turn off?
I don't mind 'em..... Mrs F has got "Love" and "Hat" on her knuckles.... she lost a finger in a bar brawl.....I think they show her more sensitive side  |
|
|
|
|
27-02-2008
|
#28 (Post Link)
|
|
Club Member
Club Member Number: 160
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 6,432
|
Re: Tatoos on women. Is it a turn off?
Not for me, thanks. Ugly, tacky things that detract from rather than decorate any natural beauty.
Originally Posted by ACAPULCO AL
not generally a fan of tattoos on women, ........... usually though it's just some fat sweaty mess from barnsley on holiday in benidorm showing everybody her "individual" tribal nonsense or a butterfly on her arse. yuk.
So true. 
Originally Posted by Lookin' 4 Ferdi
I don't mind 'em..... Mrs F has got "Love" and "Hat" on her knuckles.... she lost a finger in a bar brawl.....I think they show her more sensitive side
So funny!  |
|
|
|
|
27-02-2008
|
#29 (Post Link)
|
|
AO Silver Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Doonhame
Posts: 3,784
|
Re: Tatoos on women. Is it a turn off?
|
|
|
|
|
27-02-2008
|
#30 (Post Link)
|
|
AO Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Shropshire
Posts: 739
|
Re: Tatoos on women. Is it a turn off?
Originally Posted by Fraser
I quite like something in the small of the back, but it has to be tastefully done.
Arse Antlers!
|
|
|
|
|
27-02-2008
|
#31 (Post Link)
|
|
AO Silver Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,520
|
Re: Tatoos on women. Is it a turn off?
Hideous...cant help thinking what they will look like when they're 70 !
As attractive as an ankle bracelet
Says more than American Express could ever say.
Like a health warning on a fag packet ..shall I go on
|
|
|
|
|
27-02-2008
|
#32 (Post Link)
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Manchester
Posts: 8,933
|
Re: Tatoos on women. Is it a turn off?
|
|
|
|
|
27-02-2008
|
#33 (Post Link)
|
|
Club Member
Club Member Number: 153
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: A4074
Posts: 1,666
|
Re: Tatoos on women. Is it a turn off?
If you want to be an individual don't have a tattoo.
Ozzy Osbourne.
They don't wash off you Know.
My mates mum.
|
|
|
|
|
27-02-2008
|
#34 (Post Link)
|
|
AO Silver Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Doonhame
Posts: 3,784
|
Re: Tatoos on women. Is it a turn off?
Originally Posted by ACAPULCO AL
Or Virginia creepers...... Looks like a plant growing out of their arse... |
|
|
|
|
27-02-2008
|
#35 (Post Link)
|
|
AO Platinum Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Bridgend, South Wales
Posts: 13,151
|
Re: Tatoos on women. Is it a turn off?
I want my missus to have a Suduko puzzle on her back, to give me something to do in bed |
|
|
|
|
27-02-2008
|
#36 (Post Link)
|
|
AO Platinum Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 17,292
|
Re: Tatoos on women. Is it a turn off?
Depends where and what they are? 'Wee Horned Devil', with his trident, close to the furnace, is not amiss,imo. |
|
|
|
|
27-02-2008
|
#37 (Post Link)
|
|
AO Silver Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 3,540
|
Re: Tatoos on women. Is it a turn off?
Who gives a [censored] what they'll look like later in life?
Tattoos are an individual thing, and they're a 'now' thing.
Balls to tomorrow, because it might never come
|
|
|
|
|
28-02-2008
|
#38 (Post Link)
|
|
AO Silver Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Doonhame
Posts: 3,784
|
Re: Tatoos on women. Is it a turn off?
Originally Posted by HSTDriver
Who gives a [censored] what they'll look like later in life?
Tattoos are an individual thing, and they're a 'now' thing.
Balls to tomorrow, because it might never come
'cos they're pretty much permanent! not like earings or fancy nails, not even like henna tattoos which can be changed or removed.
Also the older they get the more hideous they look 'cos they fade.
You only have to look at blokes who've had them for years - on some you can hardly read the writing 'cos it's faded and spread a bit (and lost colour intensity).
They're ok for a night out or even for a face paint giggle at the rugby or footie....but permanently.?
....Nah |
|
|
|
|
28-02-2008
|
#39 (Post Link)
|
|
AO Platinum Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bristol, England
Posts: 25,305
|
Re: Tatoos on women. Is it a turn off?
Originally Posted by Will
'cos they're pretty much permanent! not like earings or fancy nails, not even like henna tattoos which can be changed or removed.
Also the older they get the more hideous they look 'cos they fade.
You only have to look at blokes who've had them for years - on some you can hardly read the writing 'cos it's faded and spread a bit (and lost colour intensity).
They're ok for a night out or even for a face paint giggle at the rugby or footie....but permanently.?
....Nah
He's right you know  |
|
|
|
|
28-02-2008
|
#40 (Post Link)
|
|
AO Silver Member
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Doonhame
Posts: 3,784
|
Re: Tatoos on women. Is it a turn off?
|
|
|
|
|
28-02-2008
|
#41 (Post Link)
|
|
AO Silver Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,096
|
Re: Tatoos on women. Is it a turn off?
No, but a butterfly on an arse cheek is ok. anywhere else is just wrong, especially anything on a shoulder blade, that'll look dead classy on your wedding day  |
|
|
|
|
28-02-2008
|
| |
