Originally Posted by Stori
Team tactics have always be used to maximise the chances of one person in a team winning the world championship.
I think that this works as an argument for my view since this makes the judgement unfair on the second guy. And if we take into account that the general team tactics in Scuderia have a strong 1st-2nd driver color this proves my point further. Imagine if the whole team's set up and management (car wise and race tactics) was designed on Rubens.
Originally Posted by Stori
This year Rubino looked rather "average" except when MS had already won the world Championship.
I am afraid that this is not quite true. Rubens has scored fastest race laps (a fair criterion in my view) in G.P. Canada and Indianapolis (before winning the Championship), pole position in Indianapolis (also before) and pole, fastest lap and win in Monza (after) and pole and race in China (also after) mind you with the team's whole pressure on him alone.
I don't want to remind you about the pit stops in 2003 (costed Rubens at least a win and 3 podium places).
I want to repeat that with my remarks I don't want to underestimate Michael who has proven beyond any doubt that he is one of the greatest drivers ever in F1