i wasnt aware my lack of tuning experience affects dyno readouts results achieved by other professionals, maybe if i had no dyno tuning experience at all like youself the results would be more accurate?
your last post gave you away champ, you just dont believe the dyno charts, or maybe you cannot interpret them properly. my claims are based on produced facts, i love the way you KNOW the standard computer is very good, it must be from all the tuning experience you have with it!
you can come and tell me i'm wrong when someone produces an additional 30kw out of the standard computer, hell if they get 15kw let me know ok? otherwise leave your silly comments behind, your embarrasing yourself.
guys here's something to think about, tonight we just ran a dead standard corvette, 6 litre pushrod two valve V8. It produced 272kw @ wheels ( on par with what the americans get on their dyno's ). thats double a 3 litre alfa. given the law of diminishing returns it seems odd that especially given its old tech that it easily knocks out double the grunt in standard form?
could be the 24 valve 10.5:1 compression alfa motor could be just a tad understressed in its standard tune?