Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: United Kingdom
So where does all this debate leave things? Those who have had the work done by one company reckon one thing and those having had it done by another reckon the same, but different (if you get what I mean). I suppose we are all after sort of peace of mind that we've spent our hard earned cash and got what we wanted at the best rate. So, as I see it, there are a few questions :-
1/ Is there any difference?
2/ What is the difference (if any)?
3/ How is this "difference" item resolved?
As far as I can see it, the only way it can be resolved is to somehow get an "independant investigation". I think the only way is to have a car done by one way to be compared with the other by getting the different done cars checked out on a RR. Of course, customised mapping will provide different graphs to a "standard" remapping depending on the customer requirements. However, if the results arrive giving the same increase in torque and bhp, then it is up to the customer if he wants to pay more to be able to decide how this is achieved.