Yes, this was just watching the standard boost gauge Tom. Thanks for the confirmation YTreza, I imagined it probably was a difference between the 2 engines, as my 1.9 doesn't hang about. In fact, it was an interesting comparison between the two engines really. My 1.9 would have given that 2.0 a run for its money, but ONLY because I have nearly 50,000 under my belt, and this courtesy car had only done 700 miles. Reminded me how much an engine improves with miles on it! Impressively smooth though, and definitely more refined aurally too.
AROC Cotswold Section Treasurer
2002 156 2.0 Lusso . . .1976 Spider 2000 Veloce . . . 2009 159 JtdM Ti . . . 1985 90 2.5 V6 Gold Cloverleaf