 |
|
 |
|
05-05-2008
|
#51 (Post Link)
|
|
AO Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Malmö, Sweden
Posts: 116
|
re: 2.2 JTS hesitation - now with new IMPORTANT information
Don´t you think it would be better to go to some motor Magazine/TV-programme with big impact, and ask them to write about this?
|
|
|
06-05-2008
|
#52 (Post Link)
|
|
AO Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Somerset
Posts: 174
|
re: 2.2 JTS hesitation - now with new IMPORTANT information
Its quite poor really, Im not affected but reading this you have my sympathy. Compared to say BM, AR have a fraction of the units on the roads so for me there is no excuse not to recall and remap. As stated BM would probably pull thier cars in and sort it as the brand cant be having that kind of press.
What AR seems to forget (AR MAKE SURE YOU READ THIS) is that they need bad press even less so at the moment when they are trying to re-launch themselves as premium, to be pro-active is CRITICAL. You wont get a third chance guys.
The 1.9 TDI isnt the easiest to drive either by the way, especially in stop/start traffic beginning to think that it too could do with a tidying up of the curves.
|
|
|
06-05-2008
|
#53 (Post Link)
|
|
Club Member
Club Member Number: 27
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: South Of France
Posts: 16,622
|
re: 2.2 JTS hesitation - now with new IMPORTANT information
|
|
|
06-05-2008
|
#54 (Post Link)
|
|
Club Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Kent
Posts: 87
|
re: 2.2 JTS hesitation - now with new IMPORTANT information
Originally Posted by Nev
Comon chaps.. lets get voting and tackle this problem head on!! No point just whinging and not doing anything about it. From what I can see, almost all 2.2 owners have this problem.
There have been just 2 votes including myself.....
|
|
|
06-05-2008
|
#55 (Post Link)
|
|
Club Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Kent
Posts: 87
|
re: 2.2 JTS hesitation - now with new IMPORTANT information
Originally Posted by tony44
Unfortunatley, I'm the sort of person who doesn't believe in having to pay for a remap on a £26,000 car just to get it to drive correctly.
I drive around the problem now but it doesn't mean its right.
I'm pretty confident that no other 'premium' brand would supply a car in this state.
We could do with a poll and then point Alfa UK in that direction and see if they can do something.
I completely agree... why should we pay to get this "problem" fixed when we have already paid good money for the car?? Going to write to ARUK shortly.
|
|
|
06-05-2008
|
#56 (Post Link)
|
|
Club Member
Club Member Number: 493
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Macclesfield, UK
Posts: 633
|
re: 2.2 JTS hesitation - now with new IMPORTANT information
Originally Posted by Nev
Can somebody help out and put this poll at the top of the board so that people know it exists. I would move it myself but don't know how.
|
|
|
06-05-2008
|
#57 (Post Link)
|
|
Club Member
Club Member Number: 493
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Macclesfield, UK
Posts: 633
|
re: 2.2 JTS hesitation - now with new IMPORTANT information
Sorted
|
|
|
06-05-2008
|
#58 (Post Link)
|
|
Club Member
Club Member Number: 497
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 737
|
re: 2.2 JTS hesitation - now with new IMPORTANT information
I have the hesitation as well, although it doesn't sound as bad as some of you guys. Using V-power fuel helps a lot, but hey, lets get it sorted!!
|
|
|
07-05-2008
|
#59 (Post Link)
|
|
Club Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Kent
Posts: 87
|
re: 2.2 JTS hesitation - now with new IMPORTANT information
Originally Posted by Graham_Brera
I have the hesitation as well, although it doesn't sound as bad as some of you guys. Using V-power fuel helps a lot, but hey, lets get it sorted!!
I use V power too, but the hesitation is still there. Its more noticeable when you are aware of it, initially I had naturally developed a way of driving around it by working the clutch, but after reading these posts I have realized its not just a figment of my imagination. Its predominant in low revs i.e b/w 1100 and 1300 rpm. Just try driving in 4th gear between these revs (with stereo etc. off so that you can hear the engine clearly), you will hear the engine make a burbling noise as though its being choked!! once it gets past 1300 revs the sound changes instantly and the car shoots forward. As previously mentioned no other premium brand would release a car with so called "characteristics" like this. If only my 2.2 drove as well as it looks. Lets get this sorted once and for all.
If any of you own a 2.2 JTS and havent voted,,, get voting please..........
"With growling revolutions my soul shall transcend"
|
|
|
07-05-2008
|
#60 (Post Link)
|
|
Newbie
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 17
|
re: 2.2 JTS hesitation - now with new IMPORTANT information
I've sent a link to this thread to ARUK, a week has passed, no reply.
|
|
|
07-05-2008
|
#61 (Post Link)
|
|
Club Member
Club Member Number: 493
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Macclesfield, UK
Posts: 633
|
re: 2.2 JTS hesitation - now with new IMPORTANT information
Originally Posted by Ran Sid
I've sent a link to this thread to ARUK, a week has passed, no reply.
Maybe we should also send a link to Auto Express etc.
|
|
|
07-05-2008
|
#62 (Post Link)
|
|
Club Member
Club Member Number: 27
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: South Of France
Posts: 16,622
|
re: 2.2 JTS hesitation - now with new IMPORTANT information
Recorded delivery letter is normally
my weapon of choice for kicking
up a stink. 
|
|
|
07-05-2008
|
#63 (Post Link)
|
|
Club Member
Club Member Number: 26
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Scotland
Posts: 12,411
|
re: 2.2 JTS hesitation - now with new IMPORTANT information
Good luck with this guys. Hope you get a result.
|
|
|
10-05-2008
|
#64 (Post Link)
|
|
AO Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Malmö, Sweden
Posts: 116
|
re: 2.2 JTS hesitation - now with new IMPORTANT information
It seems like the AutoDelta remap costs round 400 pounds + VAT.
Damn, I had decided on a GT, since the Brera feels so weak in the lower gears, but this may make me change my mind!
Do I understand correctly: The AD remap can make a 2,2 Brera have a more "Alfa Romeo-like" power in the 1st and 2nd gear? To me the Brera feels more like driving my old Peugeot 307 than my 156 or GTV, when accelerating.
Last edited by steffoo : 10-05-2008 at 17:12.
|
|
|
12-05-2008
|
#65 (Post Link)
|
|
Club Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Kent
Posts: 87
|
re: 2.2 JTS hesitation - now with new IMPORTANT information
Just wrote a long email to ARUK regrding the hesitation issue. Lets see what they say. Let us all write to ARUK. We need to highlight this issue and get it sorted without having to resort to extreme measures.
Any others who wrote to ARUK, received any response??
|
|
|
12-05-2008
|
#66 (Post Link)
|
|
Club Member
Club Member Number: 493
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Macclesfield, UK
Posts: 633
|
re: 2.2 JTS hesitation - now with new IMPORTANT information
I sent an email but haven't heard anything.
|
|
|
12-05-2008
|
#67 (Post Link)
|
|
Club Member
Club Member Number: 18
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sunny S.Yorkshire, UK
Posts: 10,331
|
re: 2.2 JTS hesitation - now with new IMPORTANT information
I posted this in Nev's 2.2 Poll but relevant here also I think:-
"Really wish you all good luck. Seriously.
However I very much doubt that AR Spa or ARUK will actually DO anything. Having had 1st hand recent experience with them, I doubt anything short of legals will make them lift their little fingers over anything (in their minds) so trivial and costly (group recall anyone??!!).
My only word of caution to those getting an engine remap is that if/when ARUK realise it's mapped and your car has warranty issues down the line (gearbox, brakes etc) as my remapped 159 did, they'll try EVERYTHING to wriggle out of validating any warranty.
An engine remap will help though  So I'm told..... *halo*
I drove a 2.2 and felt the same hesitation you all describe so I know how common this really is and what a bloody annoyance it is.
BTW Our Merc C class 200kompressor loaner ALSO has the SAME issues   Kangaroo or wheel spin or bogging down all the way...  "
 I'm experiencing deja vu and amnesia at the same time.. I think I've forgotten this before. 
-
145 QV -> 156 1.8TS -> 166 3.0 -> 156 SW 2.4JTD -> 166 3.0 V6 24v -> 156 F/L 2.4 JTD 20v -> 2.0TS Spider -> 159 2.4 -> 159 2.4 -> 159 TI 2.4
|
|
|
13-05-2008
|
#68 (Post Link)
|
|
Newbie
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 17
|
re: 2.2 JTS hesitation - now with new IMPORTANT information
Have sent emails to my local AR dealer, ARUK and Auto Express consumer ed. Dealer telephoned with the "characteristic" line, no response from others.
|
|
|
13-05-2008
|
#69 (Post Link)
|
|
Club Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Kent
Posts: 87
|
re: 2.2 JTS hesitation - now with new IMPORTANT information
Originally Posted by Ran Sid
Have sent emails to my local AR dealer, ARUK and Auto Express consumer ed. Dealer telephoned with the "characteristic" line, no response from others.
No reply from AR yet. I don't see how a dealer can sort this out unless AR accept there is a problem!! It is indeed disappointing that many have written to AR and there has been no sensible response. Of all the people polled, everyone has the hesitation problem. Am confident, there are many other owners outside this forum who have this issue and have not reported it. Should we all consider some joint action eg. every single one contact a motor magazine if we get no reply quckly from AR?? With the car lurching and sometimes stalling from stand still, it is more likely to cause an accident!!
|
|
|
13-05-2008
|
#70 (Post Link)
|
|
Club Member
Club Member Number: 493
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Macclesfield, UK
Posts: 633
|
re: 2.2 JTS hesitation - now with new IMPORTANT information
Originally Posted by metalgod23
No reply from AR yet. I don't see how a dealer can sort this out unless AR accept there is a problem!! It is indeed disappointing that many have written to AR and there has been no sensible response. Of all the people polled, everyone has the hesitation problem. Am confident, there are many other owners outside this forum who have this issue and have not re | |